Visual Arts, Music, and Aesthetic Experience Sociological Research, Quantitative Methods in Sociological Research, Qualitative Methods in Sociological Research on the Chinese Society Socialization, Sociological Perspectives on Multiracial, Mixed-Race, and Biracial Identities Mass Incarceration in the United States and its Collateral.
#Collective efficacy full#
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content onĪrab Spring, Mobilization, and Contentious Politics in the.Įconomic Institutions and Institutional ChangeĮthnomethodology and Conversation Analysis It was innovative in its departure from the field’s previous focus on neighborhood social composition characteristics as key predictors of violent crime, and identified a strong, partially mediating role for collective efficacy on the influence of these characteristics.Available online by subscription or purchase. This research focused on neighborhood collective efficacy regarding specific forms of community-led informal social controls toward crime prevention. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Available online by subscription or purchase. This article includes discussion of the trends found, through research across multiple fields, on the impact of perceived collective efficacy on group functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9.3:75–78. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Bandura raises an important point of difference from his earlier concept of self-efficacy by highlighting that perceived collective efficacy is more than the sum of perceived individual efficacies but rather also reflects perceptions of interactive group processes.īandura, A. It focuses on the context of social activism. This book detail’s Bandura’s early theoretical explanation of the role and processes of collective efficacy in the context of his broader social cognitive theory of psychology. Social foundations of thought and action. This section comprises fundamental core texts on collective efficacy.īandura, A. Bandura 2000 summarizes the overall trends indicated by these dual streams of research as “the higher the perceived collective efficacy, the higher the groups’ motivational investment in their undertakings, the stronger their staying power in the face of impediments and setbacks, and the greater their performance accomplishments” (p. While social psychology and social science more broadly defined differ in focus-inward to the individual psyche or outward to society-together these two streams of research offer complementary insights into the mechanisms and outcomes of collective efficacy for both individuals and groups. Social scientists have since expanded community-level collective efficacy research to include, for example, health, disaster recovery, and activism. 1997 firmly established the importance of collective efficacy for larger group processes with a particular focus on neighborhoods. While social psychologists typically investigate the role of individual perceptions of collective efficacy in small group processes, pivotal research conducted in Sampson, et al. This shift from individual to group psychology firmly rooted the concept of collective efficacy in the realms of social psychology and sociology, and opened the path for these two disciplines to apply their different philosophies to evolve somewhat parallel, yet interwoven, streams of research. Building upon his self-efficacy research, Bandura proposed collective efficacy as a group level artifact rather than simply an aggregation of individuals’ perceptions of a group’s efficacy. The Evolution of Collective Efficacy ResearchĬollective efficacy was proposed in Bandura 1986 within Bandura’s social cognitive theory of psychology.
0 kommentar(er)
